Top Clinical Pearls for Lumbar Supports

Evidence-based chiropractors employ data to establish treatment algorithms. But what happens when that data changes? While we may have performed due diligence to develop a management protocol, new research will likely change that protocol over time. The best example would be how, in the past decade(s), the management of chronic tendinopathy has flipped from suppressing inflammation (tendonitis), toward generating a controlled inflammatory response (tendinopathy). 

Providing “best practices” requires continual testing and evolution.  But when was the last time you questioned the utility of everyday practice? For me, this occurred last week, when a long-time patient told me how much better she felt after her physiatrist prescribed a lumbar support belt. My long-held belief was that lumbosacral support belts had value in isolated instances… but I needed to know- was my belief still correct, or had new literature surpassed my understanding?

This week’s blog will highlight the most up-to-date evidence on four types of lumbosacral supports, then provide clinical pearls for indications, contraindications, and implementation -including a live video demonstration.

Earlier studies confirmed that lumbar belts might not help to prevent back problems. (28,29) But does current data show any utility for the management of back pain? Here’s a quick summary of the latest evidence on four lumbosacral supports.

1. Elastic Lumbar Support Belts

 
 

“Five of the six randomized controlled trials were of good quality, with all of them showing the use of lumbar support usually reducing discomfort and improving quality of life in individuals with low back pain. The prescription for wearing lumbar support for 6-8 hours per day for at least one month showed positive results.” (1)

2019 Journal of Health & Allied Sciences Systematic Review

Mechanical Actions

  • Elevate intraabdominal pressure (2,3)

  • Decrease lordosis (4)

  • Reduce trunk range of motion regionally and segmentally (4,5)

  • Decrease lumbosacral compressive force and spinal load (6-8)

  • Decrease intradiscal pressure (9)

  • Protect from soft tissue creep (10)

Clinical Effects

  • Reduce muscle fatigue (3)

  • Decrease pain intensity and functional impairment (2,5,11,12)

  • Decrease pharmaceutical consumption (11,12)

  • Over 80% of stenosis patients wearing a lumbar belt report >30% improvement in walking distance (13)

  • Improvement correlates with compliance (14)

  • No negative effect for long-term use (6 months) (15)

Typical Indications

  • Acute or sub-acute LBP

  • Segmental instability

  • Uncomplicated compression fracture

  • Stenosis

Clinical Considerations

  • Wear the support over thin, breathable clothes

  • May be more effective than rigid braces for chronic LBP (4)

  • Patients should avoid wearing elastic braces at night

  • Contraindications include significant hypertension, as the brace increases blood pressure (16)

2. Rigid Lumbosacral Orthosis (LSO)

Mechanical Actions

  • Added trunk stiffness over elastic braces (17)

  • Improved postural control (18)

  • According to BCBS of North Carolina, LSO brace medical necessity includes (19):

    • “To reduce pain by restricting mobility of the trunk”

    • “To facilitate healing following an injury to the spine or related soft tissues”

    • “To support weak spinal muscles and/or a deformed spine”

Clinical Effects

  • Reduce muscle fatigue (3)

  • Decrease pain intensity and functional impairment (2,5,11,12)

Typical Indications:

  • Instability

  • Spondylolysis

  • Degenerative spondylolisthesis

  • Post-surgical LBP

Clinical Considerations

  • Typically more expensive than elastic brace options

  • May be more uncomfortable, resulting in lower compliance

3. Pregnancy Support Belt

 
 

The study concluded that wearing maternity support garments during pregnancy could have beneficial effects in women such as LBP and pelvic girdle pain alleviation, improvement of functionality and mobility, and reduction of risk of fall during pregnancy” (20)

2019 Journal of Pregnancy Systematic Review

Mechanical Actions

  • Supports the abdomen and lower back of pregnant women (20)

Clinical Effects

  • (Limited) evidence suggests symptomatic benefit (21-24)

  • Alleviation of LBP and pelvic girdle pain (20)

  • Improvement of functionality and mobility with reduction of fall risk (20)

Typical Indications

  • Pregnancy-related LBP

Clinical Considerations

  • Adverse effects reported include fetal heart rate changes, and skin irritation (21)

  • Providers should check with the patient’s Ob/GYN before dispensing

4. Sacroiliac Support Belt

“Pelvic belts improve health-related quality of life and are potentially attributed to decreased SIJ-related pain. Pelvic belts may therefore be considered as a cost-effective and low-risk treatment of SIJ pain.” (25)

Mechanical Actions

  • Decrease motion around the SI joint transverse axis (27)

  • Decrease ligamentous strain (27)

  • Decreased rectus femoris activity (25)

Clinical Effects

  • Decrease pain and improve function (25)

  • Improve gait cadence and velocity (25)

  • Improve postural steadiness during locomotion (25)

Typical Indications

  • Sacroiliac dysfunction, particularly hypermobility

Clinical Considerations

  • Clinicians may screen patients who are likely candidates to benefit from an SI belt by applying a compressive force through both iliac crests while the patient walks, i.e., simulate the belts compressive force.

  • Avoid prolonged hip compression in patients with co-existing gluteal tendinopathy or greater trochanteric pain syndrome. 

In conclusion, current literature indicates that lumbosacral support belts are safe with few side effects. (26)  These orthoses are not necessarily protective (28-30); however, they may help manage symptoms. And contrary to popular opinion, long-term use will not likely cause muscle weakness. (15)

Do you have your own tips for support belts? We would love to hear them. Leave your comments to help make this blog better!

Start your free trial today to see why more than 1,000 of the world’s top providers trust ChiroUp to automate their delivery of clinical excellence.

Tim Bertelsman

Dr. Tim Bertelsman is the co-founder of ChiroUp. He graduated with honors from Logan College of Chiropractic and has been practicing in Belleville, IL since 1992. He has lectured nationally on various clinical and business topics and has been published extensively. Dr. Bertelsman has served in several leadership positions and is the former president of the Illinois Chiropractic Society. He also received ICS Chiropractor of the Year in 2019.

Previous
Previous

Peeing in the Wind

Next
Next

October Chiropractic Research Roundup